1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
In reading chapter nine of our text book I was not necessarily surprised by anything, but I did find the parts about copywriting and patents to be very interesting. However, one part of the reading I found rather confusing was the part about LLLP, LLP, and LLCs. It was not so much what they were but differentiating the three. I do understand the differences discussed in the reading, but I still feel as if they are extremely similar. If I were able to ask the author two questions they would be:
1. What are your thoughts on bankruptcy, specifically how it should be dealt with?
2. Are you a patent holder? If so what was it for?
There was not anything i thought the author was really wrong about in this particular reading.
2. Are you a patent holder? If so what was it for?
There was not anything i thought the author was really wrong about in this particular reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment